THE MIRROR OF MEDIA

Job risk and illness complicate this Alberta couple’s retirement outlook


Larry and Jessica have no choice but to accept the process of reduced global dependence on oil, but they have the resources to retire with financial security

Article content

A couple we’ll call Larry, 53, and Jessica, 55, live in Alberta. Larry works in the energy industry. His job provides $230,400 annual income and he usually gets a $70,000 bonus. It’s a substantial income, but it has to support both of them: Jessica has a chronic metabolic illness and cannot work. The ups and downs of Alberta’s energy sector mean job security could become an issue. In the twelve years to Larry’s age 65 and planned retirement, they want to make their finances bulletproof enough to last for decades in the province’s rocky economy.

Advertisement

Article content

The couple has a legitimate concern. Their situation shows the personal side of global energy policy and the risk inherent in having your life’s work and earnings tied to a sector that is falling out of favour with some. However, they do have a means of achieving security apart from Larry’s job: It’s their diversified investment portfolio in which oil and gas are just a couple of percent of the total.

Article content

e-mail andrew.allentuck@gmail.com for a free Family Finance analysis

Family Finance asked Derek Moran, head of Kelowna, B.C.-based Smarter Financial Planning Ltd. to work with Larry and Jessica. He sees the core planning issue as finding a balance between adding to Jessica’s $30,200 Registered Disability Savings Plan and paying down their $242,000 mortgage. It’s not quite an equal balance, for the debt is smaller than what the sum might earn over the decades ahead. The contest is between more security and greater potential gains, the latter of which would come with the risk of larger losses that could make it harder to pay off the mortgage. That their status as a one-income family, which already brings some risk to the table, needs to factor into the equation.

Advertisement

Article content

The family’s financial structure

Jessica, permanently impaired by her illness, received Registered Disability Savings Grants that matched her own contributions prior to her age 49. She no longer receives the grants, but can keep the assets tax-free until paid out. Then only growth, not contributions, is taxed as regular income.

Their mortgage has a 1.6 per cent interest rate. Their investments can generate long-term returns a few per cent higher. Even after tax, investment gains are likely to exceed their mortgage cost. Interest rates are likely to rise, but they will lift slowly. However, the money going to mortgage interest is a declining stream and money in investments is compounding. We’ll assume that for safety, they pay down the mortgage. They take the view that a one-income family a decade from retirement should not speculate with retirement savings.

Advertisement

Article content

Retirement finances

The couple can live with some downturns. Their allocations add up to $11,719 per month of which $2,700 is the mortgage and $2,503 is savings in RRSPs, TFSAs and cash. Taking the mortgage and all savings, total $5,203, out of their budget means they can live in retirement with $6,516 of actual monthly costs, Moran explains.

They need $82,000 in combined annual after-tax income to achieve that target.

At 65, Larry will be eligible for 90 per cent of the $14,445 maximum Canada Pension Plan benefit. That works out to $13,000 per year. Jessica will be able to draw half the maximum benefit, $7,223 per year. Each will get $7,620 in Old Age Security per year.

The couple’s TFSAs total $139,100 and are fully funded. If they add $6,000 each per year for three more years and the sum grows at 3 per cent per year after inflation, they will be $190,200. If their TFSAs grow at the same rate, they will be able to pay $9,057 per year for the following 32 years to Jessica’s age 90.

Advertisement

Article content

Their RRSPs, including a Locked-In Retirement Account and Larry’s defined contribution pension total $1,491,000. If they continue to add $27,830 for three years and if the accounts grow at three per cent per year after inflation, they will hold $1,717,860. If that money is spent over the following 32 years to Jessica’s ago 90, it will pay $81,800 per year in 2021 dollars.

The RDSP holds $30,200. If that sum with no further additions grows for three years at three per cent per year, it will rise to $33,000. If spent in the same period as other accounts, it will support a stream of $1,571 per year.

Since Jessica can no longer work, we’ll assume that the couple’s retirement begins when Larry is 65.

Putting all these income streams together, then at Larry’s age 65 they will have $81,800 from RRSPs, $9,057 from TFSAs, $1,571 from the RDSP, $13,000 from Larry’s CPP account, $8,436 from Jessica’s CPP (counting a two-year delay bonus of 8.4 per cent per year), Larry’s $7,620 OAS and Jessica’s OAS of $8,686 (with a delay bonus of 7.2 per cent per year) for total income before tax of $130,170. With splits of eligible income and 20 per cent average tax (excluding TFSA cash flow) they would have $8,830 per month to spend.

Advertisement

Article content

Plan resilience

Their retirement would be a plan with many legs. A stock market flop would be a temporary setback. They would have ample capital on which to draw for a bridge to better days. Their debts will decline in this plan, making any setbacks even easier to survive.

“Savings in many vehicles, an instinct for debt reduction, and their growing assets will provide a secure retirement,” Moran concludes. “Their biggest risk is contraction of the Alberta economy and the energy industry, a process over which they have no control. However, the couple need not plan in a panic, for the migration away from fossil fuels, though a vital process, is slow and can never eliminate them entirely.”

Larry and Jessica have no choice but to accept the process of reduced global dependence on oil, but they have the resources to retire with financial security. Their diversified investments provide the stability that the shift from fossil fuels to alternatives does not. Indeed, if energy shrinks, other industries will rebalance their assets. “That’s their anchor in the storm,” Moran concludes.

Retirement stars: Four retirement stars **** out of Five

Financial Post

email andrew.allentuck@gmail.com for a free Family Finance analysis

Advertisement

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.



Source link