Ninety One gives media ‘observer status’ at Wednesday’s AGM

Journalists who “actually need to attend” the Ninety One annual normal assembly (AGM) might be given observer standing however they won’t be inspired, the fund supervisor’s CEO Hendrik du Toit advised Moneyweb forward of this yr’s assembly, which might be held on Wednesday.

No journalists attended final yr’s AGM, the primary for the de-merged entity, nevertheless it’s unclear whether or not this was as a result of they have been blocked or as a result of none requested approval for the digital operate.

Moneyweb Insider

Subscribe for full entry to all our share and unit belief knowledge instruments, our award-winning articles, and assist high quality journalism within the course of.

Learn: Investec foots R770m bill to unbundle Ninety One

Du Toit advised Moneyweb final week: “To my data we now have by no means barred anybody.” Nevertheless a spokesperson for Ninety One did inform the media earlier this yr that they weren’t permitted to attend its AGM because the occasion was “particularly for shareholders”.

A Enterprise Day article, dated February 2021, quotes Du Toit explaining that the AGM is the one annual alternative for all shareholders of the corporate to fulfill its board of administrators.

“Ninety One usually communicates with different stakeholders, together with the media, in an open and clear means,” stated Du Toit again in February.

He additionally advised Moneyweb round that point that the board felt the AGM was an particularly vital occasion for small shareholders and that they may get crowded out if the media attended.

“Proper now we really feel it is a discussion board notably for small shareholders,” Du Toit pressured, stating {that a} full model of the AGM is revealed on the corporate’s web site.

Final week he reiterated that Ninety One “will publish the minutes shortly after the conferences on our web site for one and all to see”.

Learn: Ninety One becomes first SA signatory to ‘net zero’ asset managers initiative

The choice to be somewhat extra welcoming at this yr’s AGM was apparently prompted by the truth that quite a few journalists had raised the problem.

“We mentioned it on the board and concluded that those that actually need to attend and who make that request ought to be given observer standing.

“We’ve nothing to cover and this was changing into a distraction from the duty at hand,” stated Du Toit.

That is simply as effectively as a result of because it occurs the minutes of final yr’s assembly weren’t out there for one and all to see – not shortly after the assembly nor 11 months later. All that’s out there are the outcomes of the voting on the resolutions.

These are what each listed firm is obliged to reveal in a Sens announcement inside 24 hours of the AGM.


There was definitely no indication of what, if any, points have been raised by shareholders – huge or small.

Earlier this week a spokesperson for Ninety One acknowledged that “sadly solely the outcomes have been revealed, not the minutes” however added, “I do know that this yr we’re aiming to publish minutes as effectively”. No clarification was given for why the minutes of final yr’s AGM weren’t made public.

The one different listed firm that has baulked on the media attending its AGM lately is one other fund supervisor, Sygnia, whose board blocked journalists from attending its AGM earlier this yr.

Sygnia shareholders had been anticipated to boost some controversial points on the assembly.

Most within the funding group had assumed the problem of whether or not or not the media is allowed into shareholder conferences had been settled again in 2007. In February of that yr furnishings retailer JD Group (now a part of JSE-listed Pepkor) blocked quite a few journalists from attending its AGM.

Learn:  Sygnia, Wierzycka and several ‘small related party transactions’

Shareholder activist Theo Botha had knowledgeable the JD board and journalists that he meant elevating quite a few controversial points. The JD board subsequently relied on an age-old excuse to flee the mounting opprobrium: it blamed a very zealous junior official for misinterpreting directions.

It’s vital to level out that journalists will not be entitled by regulation to attend shareholder conferences, solely shareholders are and that they’re definitely not allowed to ask questions.

It’s additionally vital to level out that journalists can simply side-step this legality by shopping for one share, however that triggers a component of deception. And if confidential issues are mentioned throughout the assembly then that ‘deception’ does elevate insider-trading issues – assuming the journalist intends to write down in regards to the occasions.

However by-and-large it’s assumed that journalists will assist to advertise the transparency and disclosure that play an vital position within the King Code of Company Governance and the varied governance initiatives that enormous listed corporations comparable to Ninety One have signed as much as together with the UNPRI initiative.

For this reason most corporations tolerate the presence of the media.

Having the media in attendance can also be doubtless to make sure that the smaller shareholders who’re unable to attend the assembly do get some sense of what transpired past the precise voting on the resolutions.

These are the shareholders Du Toit says he’s involved about. They deserve greater than the outcomes of the voting.

Source link